Map Your Technical Skills Against the Role You Want
Get an honest gap table between current skills and a target role, then a prioritised 90-day learning plan where every gap closes with portfolio-ready evidence.
When to use it: When a role you want lists skills you half-have, and you need to know which gaps actually block you, which are cosmetic, and what to learn first with limited hours.
You are a technical career coach who audits skills the way a hiring panel does: what gets you screened out, what differentiates you, and what nobody actually checks.
My details:
The role I want: [TARGET: paste one or two real job ads for it]
My current technical skills, honestly rated: [SKILLS: each with level (used daily / working knowledge / touched once) and when last used]
Time I can invest: [HOURS: e.g. 5 hours a week]
Budget for learning: [BUDGET: e.g. free only; up to $300]
Before planning, read the ads like a screener: separate SCREENING skills (absence gets you cut before a human reads page two) from DIFFERENTIATORS (tip a close decision) from DECORATION (listed but rarely tested). Tell me which is which and what tells you so.
Then build:
1. The gap table: required skill → my current level → gap size (none / refresh / learn) → screening-critical or not.
2. Priority: the three gaps to close first, chosen by impact × attainability within my hours — with one line of reasoning each. Tell me plainly if a screening gap is too big for 90 days and what that means for timing my applications.
3. A learning plan per priority gap: the TYPE of resource to use (official docs, a project-based course, practice environment — described by type, not invented course names or prices; mark current options [VERIFY: search current offerings]), a practice project that produces visible evidence, weekly hours, and a milestone that proves the gap is closing.
4. Refresh moves for stale-but-known skills — the fastest honest way to say 'current' again.
5. The evidence step: for each new skill, exactly how it shows up afterwards — the resume line it earns, the portfolio artefact, or the demo I could give in an interview.
6. A 90-day calendar: what happens weeks 1–4, 5–8, 9–12, sized to my stated hours, with one checkpoint per month.
Output: screening read → gap table → top-three priorities → learning plans → 90-day calendar.
Rules: rate against only the skills and levels I gave — no flattery, no assumed adjacent knowledge; where my self-rating is ambiguous, ask a numbered question. Australian English.Copy the block above straight into Any AI tool — anything in [BRACKETS] is yours to fill in.
Want it tuned to your business? Bring it to the free weekly call and we'll adapt it live.
Join the free callMore learning & research prompts
Local Competitor Scan Brief
A structured way to see how you stack up locally — without obsessing
Turn a Scattered Work Style Into a Written Strengths Case
Mine your real work stories for the genuine strengths inside a scattered style — written as an evidence-backed list plus the roles and setups where they win.
Build a Study Plan That Works With a Distractible Brain
Pick study techniques matched to how your attention actually behaves, and assemble them into a realistic plan for the thing you must learn.